OUR TEAM | OUR SCOOP | OUR ADVISORS

Blog Watching
Scoop08 scours the daily political blogs to bring you the most important and interesting posts of the day.
Visit the Blog      Join Scoop08      Suggest Stories
Welcome To Your Newsroom SUBMISSIONS POLICY
Column Letter Feature Idea

Scoop08Personalities



Scoop08 Video Contest | Submit


Have an idea or tip? Write us:

Choose Your Beat:
Constitution Party Democrats
Green Party
Independents
Libertarian Party
Reform Party
Republicans
Socialist Party
Write-in Candidates

Arts
Combat & Conflict
Economics
Education
Energy
Environment
Guns & Safety
Healthcare
Immigration
Gender & Sexuality
Poverty
Technology
Terrorism
Women's Issues

Culture
Debates
Democracy
Ethics
Fashion
Generation
Global Policy
Media
Philosophy
Rhetoric
Sports
Spouses & Families
Strategy
Youth Vote

Africa
Asia
Australia
Canada
Europe
Mexico
Middle East
South America
BLOG
PUBLISHED ON: February 26, 2008 - 9:34pm
PUBLISHED IN:

Candidates Claim Consistency on NAFTA

Meghan Louttit   Managing Editor

And we finally get to NAFTA, one of the most important issues here in Ohio.

Unfortunately, Clinton gets the question first and promptly has another "change you can Xerox" moment when she referred to the Saturday Night Live skit, suggesting they should get Obama another pillow. While there weren't significant groans from the crowd, the press room let out a round of them.

But onto NAFTA ... the candidates are clearly saying what they know Ohio voters want to hear. Both candidates have supported NAFTA in the past, as was pointed out earlier on MSNBC, and Russert is challenging both candidates on those points.

Unfortunately Obama's and Clinton's answers on NAFTA focus more on their supposed consistency on the issue rather than exactly what they would do about it and how they would like to see it renegotiated, as both expressed would be their first option.

Their continued claims that they have been consistent on this issue (clearly not true for either) are in sharp contrast to Sen. John McCain's brand of "straight talk," which could strike a chord with voters in the general election, especially with the hords of voters who are sick of the Bush administration's doublespeak. If the Democratic nominee continues to claim consistency to save face on this issue and others, he or she might find themselves in trouble.