OUR TEAM | OUR SCOOP | OUR ADVISORS

Blog Watching
Scoop08 scours the daily political blogs to bring you the most important and interesting posts of the day.
Visit the Blog      Join Scoop08      Suggest Stories
Welcome To Your Newsroom SUBMISSIONS POLICY
Column Letter Feature Idea

Scoop08Personalities



Scoop08 Video Contest | Submit


Have an idea or tip? Write us:

Choose Your Beat:
Constitution Party Democrats
Green Party
Independents
Libertarian Party
Reform Party
Republicans
Socialist Party
Write-in Candidates

Arts
Combat & Conflict
Economics
Education
Energy
Environment
Guns & Safety
Healthcare
Immigration
Gender & Sexuality
Poverty
Technology
Terrorism
Women's Issues

Culture
Debates
Democracy
Ethics
Fashion
Generation
Global Policy
Media
Philosophy
Rhetoric
Sports
Spouses & Families
Strategy
Youth Vote

Africa
Asia
Australia
Canada
Europe
Mexico
Middle East
South America
BLOG
PUBLISHED ON: February 26, 2008 - 9:49pm
PUBLISHED IN:

The Foreign Policy Question

Meghan Louttit   Managing Editor

This is one of the significant issues where Clinton and Obama have notable differences in their proposed policies.

Clinton's experience in foreign policy is where she can really trump Obama in this debate. And she is.

When Obama speaks about foreign policy he talks mostly about Clinton's judgment about going to war, which he denounced in a speech in 2002, and about his policy towards Pakistan. Clinton uses this opportunity to bring up other issues she's worked on, including peace talks in Northern Ireland.

When it comes to Iraq, Tim Russert poses a very plausible scenario for Iraq's reaction to the withdrawal of troops. Obama acknowledges that he would respect the wishes of the sovereign nation, as does Clinton.

Russert's hypothetical eerily reminds me of Brit Hume's nuclear doomstay scenarios posed during earlier FOX debates.